Enhance Canada NOC coding with OaSIS codes
Created Date | Jun 20, 2023 |
---|---|
Target PI | |
Target Release | |
Jira Epic | |
Document Status | Review |
Epic Owner | @Hal Bonella |
Stakeholder | @Nathan Triepke @Bacle Fowler |
Engineering Team(s) Involved | Documents Micro C&E Analyst Taxonomy Data SOLutions LMI |
PART 1
Customer/User Job-to-be-Done or Problem
The Scope of the user problem should be narrowed to the scope you are planning to solve in this phase of work. There may be other aspects you are aware of and plan to solve in the future. For now, put those in the Out of Scope section.
When Canadian Government clients use the JPA data, they want to see NOC occupation data further subdivided into OaSIS, so they can report against it. They are required to use NOC/OaSIS rather than LOT . See https://noc.esdc.gc.ca/Oasis/OasisMethodology for further details.
Value to Customers & Users
In the JTBD framework, these are the “pains” and “gains” your solution will address. Other ways to think about it: What’s the rationale for doing this work? Why is it a high priority problem for your customers and how will our solution add value?
See https://economicmodeling.atlassian.net/browse/SUPPORT-30930
and https://economicmodeling.atlassian.net/browse/SUPPORT-30891
Value to Lightcast
Sometimes we do things for our own benefit. List those reasons here.
Target User Role/Client/Client Category
Who are we building this for?
Governmental organizations in Canada that need to report using NOC/OaSIS and not LOT. OaSIS allows the NOC to be broken out into 900 specialized occupations rather than the 500+ that are there now.
Delivery Mechanism
How will users receive the value?
JPA report
Success Criteria & Metrics
How will you know you’ve completed the epic? How will you know if you’ve successfully addressed this problem? What usage goals do you have for these new features? How will you measure them?
Aspects that are out of scope (of this phase)
What is explicitly not a part of this epic? List things that have been discussed but will not be included. Things you imagine in a phase 2, etc.
PART 2
Solution Description
Early UX (wireframes or mockups)
<FigmaLink>
Non-Functional Attributes & Usage Projections
Consider performance characteristics, privacy/security implications, localization requirements, mobile requirements, accessibility requirements
Dependencies
Is there any work that must precede this? Feature work? Ops work?
Legal and Ethical Considerations
Just answer yes or no.
High-Level Rollout Strategies
Initial rollout to [internal employees|sales demos|1-2 specific beta customers|all customers]
If specific beta customers, will it be for a specific survey launch date or report availability date
How will this guide the rollout of individual stories in the epic?
The rollout strategy should be discussed with CS, Marketing, and Sales.
How long we would tolerate having a “partial rollout” -- rolled out to some customers but not all
Risks
Focus on risks unique to this feature, not overall delivery/execution risks.
Open Questions
What are you still looking to resolve?
Complete with Engineering Teams
Effort Size Estimate |
---|
Estimated Costs
Direct Financial Costs
Are there direct costs that this feature entails? Dataset acquisition, server purchasing, software licenses, etc.?
Team Effort
Each team involved should give a general t-shirt size estimate of their work involved. As the epic proceeds, they can add a link to the Jira epic/issue associated with their portion of this work.
Team | Effort Estimate (T-shirt sizes) | Jira Link |
---|---|---|
|
|
|