SkillFit: Establish Integration Testing Pattern
Created Date | Feb 2, 2023 |
---|---|
Target PI | PI 2 |
Target Release | Apr 14, 2023 |
Jira Epic | |
Document Status | Committed |
Epic Owner | @Taylor Rogers |
Stakeholder | @Matt Horning (Deactivated) @Tori Przybyl |
Engineering Team(s) Involved | SKILLFIT |
PART 1
Customer/User Job-to-be-Done or Problem
The Scope of the user problem should be narrowed to the scope you are planning to solve in this phase of work. There may be other aspects you are aware of and plan to solve in the future. For now, put those in the Out of Scope section.
When developing the SkillFit App, I want to be able to push code without worrying about breaking existing features, so I can ship new features more quickly.
Value to Customers & Users
In the JTBD framework, these are the “pains” and “gains” your solution will address. Other ways to think about it: What’s the rationale for doing this work? Why is it a high priority problem for your customers and how will our solution add value?
We currently have somewhere around a 10% failure rate on various skillfit pages (profile, jobs, sign-up, job posting). We also need to be able to push new features without making these pages any worse/more fragile.
Value to Lightcast
Sometimes we do things for our own benefit. List those reasons here.
Faster feature development in the future.
More robust app in the future
More knowledge about when things break and why
Target User Role/Client/Client Category
Who are we building this for?
Jobseekers
Developers
Delivery Mechanism
How will users receive the value?
They should see fewer errors and more new features more quickly
Success Criteria & Metrics
How will you know you’ve completed the epic? How will you know if you’ve successfully addressed this problem? What usage goals do you have for these new features? How will you measure them?
A new pattern (using React-testing-library and MSW) is established
The POC mocks requests to test different states of a page/component
We should be able to copy the pattern easily to reduce testing friction
We should be alerted if we push code that breaks important features
Aspects that are out of scope (of this phase)
What is explicitly not a part of this epic? List things that have been discussed but will not be included. Things you imagine in a phase 2, etc.
PART 2
Solution Description
Early UX (wireframes or mockups)
<FigmaLink>
Non-Functional Attributes & Usage Projections
Consider performance characteristics, privacy/security implications, localization requirements, mobile requirements, accessibility requirements
Dependencies
Is there any work that must precede this? Feature work? Ops work?
Legal and Ethical Considerations
Just answer yes or no.
High-Level Rollout Strategies
Initial rollout to [internal employees|sales demos|1-2 specific beta customers|all customers]
If specific beta customers, will it be for a specific survey launch date or report availability date
How will this guide the rollout of individual stories in the epic?
The rollout strategy should be discussed with CS, Marketing, and Sales.
How long we would tolerate having a “partial rollout” -- rolled out to some customers but not all
Risks
Focus on risks unique to this feature, not overall delivery/execution risks.
Open Questions
What are you still looking to resolve?
Complete with Engineering Teams
Effort Size Estimate |
---|
Estimated Costs
Direct Financial Costs
Are there direct costs that this feature entails? Dataset acquisition, server purchasing, software licenses, etc.?
Team Effort
Each team involved should give a general t-shirt size estimate of their work involved. As the epic proceeds, they can add a link to the Jira epic/issue associated with their portion of this work.
Team | Effort Estimate (T-shirt sizes) | Jira Link |
---|---|---|
|
|
|