Created Date

Target PI

PI-3

Target Release

Jira Epic

Type /jira and put in the issue ID of the epic

Document Status

Epic Owner

Duncan Brown (Unlicensed)

Stakeholder

Bram Velthuis Mauro Pelucchi Alexandra Malfant

Engineering Team(s) Involved

PART 1

Customer/User Job-to-be-Done or Problem

The Scope of the user problem should be narrowed to the scope you are planning to solve in this phase of work. There may be other aspects you are aware of and plan to solve in the future. For now, put those in the Out of Scope section.

When using Lightcast French and Italian job postings, I want to be able to analyse with the Lightcast Occupations Taxonomy, so I can gain rich, comparable analysis with our English language data.

During PI-2 models were developed for LOTv6 in French and Italian and (hopefully by the end of PI-2) subjected to initial quality analysis. During PI-3 we want to continue this work and identify the creation of rules and a mechanism for their maintenance and operation, with the ambition of QA and deployment of French and Italian LOTv6 to reasonable quality levels during PI-4 (depending on how this work goes).

Value to Customers & Users

In the JTBD framework, these are the “pains” and “gains” your solution will address. Other ways to think about it: What’s the rationale for doing this work? Why is it a high priority problem for your customers and how will our solution add value?

Global customers and customers within France and Italy will be able to benefit from the richness and cross-country comparability of LOTv6.

Value to Lightcast

Sometimes we do things for our own benefit. List those reasons here. 
LOTv6 represents a substantial asset to Lightcast and we want to maximise its return by making it usable across different languages. This work represents initial moves in this long term direction, with the aim that we can use it as a model for scaling to further languages.

Target User Role/Client/Client Category

Who are we building this for?

All Lightcast user categories.

Delivery Mechanism

How will users receive the value?

Eventual delivery will be via Global Postings and Spotlight.

Success Criteria & Metrics

How will you know you’ve completed the epic? How will you know if you’ve successfully addressed this problem? What usage goals do you have for these new features? How will you measure them?

To be determined by the time the Epic begins, but establish benchmarks for levels of precision and recall for LOT to be launch-ready.

Aspects that are out of scope (of this phase)

What is explicitly not a part of this epic? List things that have been discussed but will not be included. Things you imagine in a phase 2, etc.

PART 2

Solution Description

Early UX (wireframes or mockups)

<FigmaLink>

Non-Functional Attributes & Usage Projections

Consider performance characteristics, privacy/security implications, localization requirements, mobile requirements, accessibility requirements

Dependencies

Is there any work that must precede this? Feature work? Ops work? 

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Just answer yes or no.

High-Level Rollout Strategies

Risks

Focus on risks unique to this feature, not overall delivery/execution risks. 

Open Questions

What are you still looking to resolve?


Complete with Engineering Teams

Effort Size Estimate

Sum the t-shirt sizes below using 1 for "S", 2 for "M", etc.

Estimated Costs

Direct Financial Costs

Are there direct costs that this feature entails? Dataset acquisition, server purchasing, software licenses, etc.?

Team Effort

Each team involved should give a general t-shirt size estimate of their work involved. As the epic proceeds, they can add a link to the Jira epic/issue associated with their portion of this work.

Team

Effort Estimate (T-shirt sizes)

Jira Link

Analyst Red, Documents, Data Production, etc.

Small, Medium, Large, etc.

Type /jira to create a link to an epic or issue